Gulf of Mexico Gets a New Name: Why Oil Companies Are Adopting ‘Gulf of America’

For over four centuries, the Gulf of Mexico has been recognized internationally as one of the largest bodies of water in North America. However, in a surprising move, former U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order renaming it as the “Gulf of America.” This change has sparked both support and criticism from various sectors, with major oil companies, tech giants, and political figures weighing in on the decision.

Oil Companies Embrace the Name Change

Among the first to adopt the new name was British Petroleum (BP), which has rebranded its operations and documents to refer to the “Gulf of America” instead of the historical “Gulf of Mexico.” Other energy giants, such as Chevron and Shell, quickly followed suit, integrating the term into their reports, regulatory filings, and public communications.

Chevron CEO Mike Wirth reinforced the company’s commitment to aligning with federal terminology, stating in a conference call that “We’re calling it Gulf of America. That’s the position of the U.S. government now.” Many industry analysts believe this move is strategic, as oil companies seek favorable policies, including the expansion of federal waters for drilling.

Tech Giants and Maps Reflecting the New Name

The influence of this decision has extended beyond the oil industry. Google, Microsoft, and Apple have all updated their mapping services to reflect the new designation for U.S. users. Google, which typically aligns with official government sources for geographical names, justified the update as part of its policy.

Microsoft followed the same approach, stating that it is updating Bing Maps in accordance with its standard product policies. Apple has yet to make an official statement but has already reflected the change in some of its services.

Political and Corporate Strategy Behind the Shift

The decision to adopt the “Gulf of America” nomenclature isn’t just about aligning with government policy—it’s also a calculated move by businesses to maintain favorable relations with Trump and his administration.

Historically, major corporations have adjusted their policies to align with presidential directives. Similar trends were observed when companies scaled back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives following Trump’s opposition to such programs. Now, with the renaming of the Gulf, businesses are taking steps to avoid political friction and secure regulatory benefits.

Opposition and Public Reaction

Despite corporate acceptance, public sentiment towards the renaming has been largely negative. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 70% of respondents opposed the change. Critics argue that the Gulf of Mexico’s historical significance should not be altered for political reasons.

Internationally, the response has been mixed. Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum humorously proposed renaming an area covering both Mexico and the U.S. as “America Mexicana,” emphasizing that the Gulf is widely recognized as the Gulf of Mexico. Many historians and geographical experts have also expressed concerns about the precedent set by altering long-established names based on political preferences.

Legal and Practical Implications

Trump’s executive order applies strictly to federal communications and publications. This means that private entities and international organizations are not legally required to adopt the new name. However, some state governments and local institutions have already started using the term “Gulf of America” in official documents.

For instance, Florida has issued an executive order using the new name, and Louisiana’s Port Fourchon, a major maritime hub, has also made the change on its official website. While not legally bound, these institutions recognize the potential advantages of aligning with federal policy.

The Role of the U.S. Board on Geographic Names

The U.S. Board on Geographic Names, which standardizes geographical names across federal agencies, is responsible for implementing the change. Historically, the board ensures consistency in official government documentation, though non-federal entities can continue using the traditional name.

Companies like ExxonMobil, Halliburton, and Murphy Oil have not yet made the switch, possibly waiting for further clarification from the board before fully committing to the new terminology.

Historical and Cultural Significance of the Gulf of Mexico

The Gulf of Mexico has held its name since at least the 16th century, playing a crucial role in the economic and cultural history of Mexico, the United States, and Cuba. It is one of the world’s largest bodies of water, supporting vital industries such as fishing, tourism, and oil production.

While the political decision to rename it as the “Gulf of America” has gained traction among corporations, historians argue that geographical names should be based on historical and cultural contexts rather than political agendas.

Implications for Businesses and Media

Failing to comply with the new naming convention could have consequences. A recent incident involving the Associated Press (AP) highlighted potential repercussions. The AP reported that one of its journalists was denied entry to a White House event after the news agency stated it would continue referring to the water body as the “Gulf of Mexico.”

This raises concerns about press freedom and the impact of political influence on journalistic integrity. Major publications like The Wall Street Journal have opted to use the traditional name while acknowledging the new terminology as relevant in certain contexts.

Future of the Naming Controversy

The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico remains a divisive issue, with strong opinions on both sides. Businesses are weighing their options, balancing political compliance with historical accuracy. As the debate continues, the question remains: will this name change be a lasting legacy of Trump’s administration, or will future leaders reverse the decision?

One thing is clear—this move has set a precedent for how political influence can shape geographical identity. Whether the rest of the world follows suit remains to be seen.